Hello Attila,

I don’t think the similarities in the economic group point towards poverty being completely solvable.
If anything, they say that the situation can be improved, with no specific extent.

Also,

The Existential approach described really bugs me. What’s more real than people dying of hunger, starving to death? Really. The definition of existentialism is that a person lives live for himself, and should know that his actions have consequences and that responsibility should be taken. Agreeing that something happened because of me.
An existential approach see the obvious, that poverty, and extreme poverty exist. Existentialism is not moral; but the above things are true.