Monday, May 08, 2006

The Purpose of all Wars, is Peace

The reason all these have the same date, is because I worked on them at different times its just that I posted them all at the same time.

- "The purpose of all wars, is peace." -Saint Augustine

This quote is an incredible paradox, is it not? Well, the purpose of all wars should be to end all wars, but as we know from the painfully current events, it too often isn’t.

This paradox makes sense because war should be fought only with the intention of the highest good. The Dalai Lama believes that force should only be used with a compassionate concern for others well being. Saint Augustine shares a similar belief in this paradox, in that war should be used only if it ensures peace as best it can.

Rudkin tells us that paradoxes are good, and should be embraced. Most people when they hear the word paradox, shy away, and dislike the word and the concept. But I agree, this being not the first social science course I’ve taken, I seem to notice that paradoxes really bring a lot to the table, when studied.

I know the word dichotomy very well from the course, feminism through an international perspective, I took here, at U of I. But the word dialectic sounds pretty knew to me. The chapter only gave a read between the line definitions of what the actual word means. Dialectics are logical methods and processes of thinking designed to arrive at the truth. The chapter summarized the many paradoxes present in the book.

The dialectics were past and future, the tension between reflecting and action, between science and values, between self and community, similarities and differences, things changing and things staying the same.

The dialectic of past and future reflected in a way upon many “hard” sciences like physics, or biology making disprove theories absolute, according to Rudkin. But I disagree with Rudkin, even in “hard” sciences, disprove theories have their place, definitely a larger place than was gotten from the reading. But the paradox is that the past does play a larger role in the social sciences than it does in the “hard” sciences. Also, once a problem in the hard sciences is solved, it will stay solved, until it’s disprove by something more advanced or because somebody’s experiment doesn’t match. But in the social sciences, some problems aren’t really solved completely, and have to be resolved and resolved numerous times in many different times and places.

An interesting parody was the tension between action and reflection, between activists and academics; it said that community psychologists are placed in precarious position, by having to be both of these roles. I am kind of surprised that Ruskin is telling to be part active. I like this stance, and I support it.

I always thought that values played an important part in science. The values of research, logic, thoroughness, unbias, should be placed first. I didn’t get completely what Rudkin had to say here. I must admit that I don’t like the way Rudkin writes sometimes, it seems like she just tries to fill up the page and kina avoids getting to the point.

A paradox that Rudkin stressed was the one between the self and community. The lesson from this paradox is that issues should be solved on the right level between the self and the community and not just the self how it was preached for the longest time.

Humanity, It’s Not Hopeless

“Never Send to know for whom the bell tolls; It tolls for thee” John Donne

"Most of the change we think we see in life is due to truths being in and out of favor" Robert Frost

Humanity, It’s Not Hopeless

After reading the last chapter in the book, I got to thinking about what I think aboiut the future of humanity, and other sources. This is what I really think about this world, about us all being a part of this globe together.

When I was filming a whole day of Ebertfest, the director of Man Push Cart, told Ebert that he doesn’t believe that the world will get better. He said that he doesn’t believe in poverty ever ending, world hunger ending, the super rich ever not being full of greed, wars stopping, and people not suffering. He said that he learned from looking at history how the world works, and that suffering will always exist.

The director said that he was a big fan of and that a lot of his ideas came from the French author Albert Camus. I was pleased to hear that because I also a big fan. I have read the lengthy Plague and the Stranger, although I’ve never read the The Myth of Sisyphus, which is what the director said he based the movie on. I can see where the director, Ramin Bahrani, is coming from. It’s sad and scary, looking at history, there doesn’t seem to be much hope for humanity. It seems that I am speaking about history in these papers a lot, at times like these I wish knew more about history. Why were there so many wars during the 20th century? I hope it’s because of the many developments and the technological leaps that have occurred in these times.

But On the other hand, people have done lots of things throughout history, they have traded, grew, colonized, lost, killed, saved, but it seems to me that humanity has progressed. There have been people like me that have tried to change the world, to, improve it, and as far they could, they succeeded, so therefore, me and you can too.

I’ve chosen to direct my life by the principles of the Dalai Lama, and so I guess I don’t believe that there isn’t any hope for humanity. From a different perspective, but very close one, it doesn’t matter, because believing and acting that the world can be changed for the better is the only way a person can be happy with the life he or she lives.

There is a quote in the supplemental reading list, “Never send to know for whom the bell tolls; It tolls for thee” John Donne. I think, but I’m not sure, that the meaning is that bells usually toll for a person when that person is dead at that person’s church service. Taken with the whole poem though, I think Donne’s meaning is that we all have a responsibility a call to action to contribute to the world as much as we can.

It seems to be hard to trace the timeline of poverty. The oldest human issues would be basic needs, of the people, and therefore poverty can be considered to be the most essential issue existing for humanity out there. When a person is in extreme poverty, that person doesn’t have access to shelter, food, proper clothing, and sanitation. So poverty should be the main issue that people should focus on.

So, what to I believe in, well I believe that humanity defiently isn’t doomed. History shows us, that humanity isn’t stupid, (all in all), and that it does coninously strive for progress. So, in the future, distant and especially starkly near, humanity will either be full of injustice and misery like it is, or it will wise up and be compassionate and caring. I’m definetly completley living by the second.

A World Without War Now That’s An Alternative Setting

A World Without War Now That’s An Alternative Setting


After reading the stuff on Alternative settings, I imagined a world without war.

This kind of alternative setting might be even more important than a world without poverty.

Poverty isn’t the biggest issue facing us, rather its war; it is the continuous armament of the globe. Nothing else is in as much opposition to the basic humanity of the globe, as the continuous armament and use of weapons. Some armed conflicts are necessary, like WW2 and many others. But it’s only possible to know if a war is justified with hindsight. It’s very important never to presume that we know whether the outcome of a particular war will be justified or not. According to the Dalai Lama the Korean War was also justified because it gave South Korea, a chance to gradually develop a Democracy. The Dalai Lama proposes that all countries gradually reduce their weapons, at the same time.

First Nuclear Weapons have to be removed, then mass casualty, Chemical and Biological Weapons, offensive weapons, and finally defensive weapons need to be eliminated. At the end that only a security/police international coalition remains and that it is equally represented by each country, no matter what the size.I’m not sure if eventually the equally represented coalition should rid itself of weapons.

If every nation, no matte what the size had equal representation, then that would be the major step toward creating a stable international community.

The world spends its resources and money on what? Well, it spends a huge percentage on war. Huge, I’m not sure how much is spent, but its huge “Of course, the immense financial dividend reaped from the cessation of arms production would also provide a fantastic windfall for global development” (http://www.dalailama.com/page.63.htm).


“No matter what the case may be, I feel that a compassionate concern for the well-being of others - not simply for oneself - is the sole justification for the use of force.”

http://www.dalailama.com/page.44.htm

Institutionalized Murder

Institutionalized Murder

What do you do when you execute a person? Do you say that he doesn’t deserve to live? That by doing what was done, that individual “deferred” for lack of a better word, the right of life. Many people think, and I did kind too, that after committing executable crimes, the person shouldn’t be using resources like food, and tax money, while other “good” people are starving, and need those resources a lot more. There’s of course the chance that the crime can be committed again, and so the person will just continue to stay locked and use up resources in our already extremely “overcrowded” and critically deficient prison system.

As far as I know, two great movies came out on the topic of the death penalty. Monster and Capote. Interestingly, both earned their lead characters Oscars for best actor.

Unfortunately, I haven’t had the time; I haven’t, to see Capote. After seeing the extremely highly regarded Monster, I would have never put Charlieze to death. Movies are great when they help you emphasize. Every human being in this world should be empathized with, and that includes multiple homicides.

Selby: I just wanna live, Lee. I just want a normal happy life. I don't know why you did this.
Aileen: Because I love you. Because I love you and I never wanna to loose you and that's all. I love you from my heart, my soul, my mind. And I never let you down. All right? Because it was me. It was only me. And I'll tell them that, ok. It's over for me now. And I never gonna see you again.
Selby: Yeah, I know.
Aileen: I wish there was a way that people can forgive you for something about this, you know. But they can't. They can't, man. So I gonna die, Sel.... Hey Sel, I'll never forget you. Good bye, baby. Bye baby.
Selby: Good bye, Lee.

This is an excerpt from the fictional movie Monster. I understand that I’m using dialogue from a fictional movie to help justify a very serious issue. This is very unheard of, but I believe that a movie of this stature makes a very important social point.

Many people believe that people who committed horrible crimes are disturbed, mentally abnormal in a significant way. There is no denying this, they are. What else could have driven them to those crimes?

Maybe they aren’t in the least mentally ill, and are simply evil. They have calculated their crimes with full knowledge, of the consequences, of who is going to be hurt. So these people are just like the majority of the population, but are extremely not like the rest, because their motivation and morality are completely skewed or absent. No, people like this don’t exist, there is no such thing. If maybe there is one person in a million like this, then that person would be mentally ill. Exhibiting such traits is a sign of illness.


According to Amnesty International, over half the countries in the world have now abolished the death penalty in law or practice. The US joins the ranks of countries like China, Iran, and Saudi Arabia as the number one perpetuators of this crime globally. For the year 2005, 94% of all executions come from these four countries.

It’s alarming that we are among these three countries. In 2005, we have executed 60 people and condemned 106 to death sentence.

The Money of the Rich

The Money of the Rich


“They have seized upon the government by bribery and corruption. They have made speculation and public robbery a science. They have loaded the nation, the state, the county, and the city with debt
Denis Kearney

As I started writing this response it turened into a PDA. Imainge that.

The Rich Don’t Pay Taxes

I admit that I don’t know enough I don’t know enough about taxes system that we live in, but I believe that there’s a lot of truth to what fallows.

Big business pays doesn’t pay taxes. It seems like the richest should pay most taxes, but it seems like they pay the least. They have expensive accountants, huge tax cuts, and countless other tricks to avoid paying taxes. Giving the filthy rich huge tax cuts, doesn’t make any sense. One of the main reasons rich don’t pay taxes is because their profits don’t come in the form of a salaried income, they have their gigantic wealth in the form of a molten of investments, and the large majority of taxes comes from income tax.

The rich then give the all Republicans and most Democrats campaign money they have in return, and then the Republicans use that money to brainwash the slight majority of the Americans, into believing in these lies. Many lies, one of which is that the Republicans are poor and don’t need to be burden with any more nasty evil taxes.

We live in a tiered tax bracket, but the bracket should be higher, a lot.

If you come from a family which has money, often the principle is invested, producing more money. There are trusts for members of the family, which usually are funded primarily by accumulated interest, dividends, money produced by investing the principle. Some of this money is also reinvested, producing more money. With this system in place, you never actually spend your money; it works for you, producing more.

People should be educated about the seriousness of this extremely widespread inequality.

Actually, in our country, there is no Democracy, and the government controls the people.

I’m saying this because Bush was never elected in the first place.

This Domestic Crisis is Very Severe

Poverty should be among the top priorities of state and national governments.

Poverty exists everywhere, in every State in the US, and in every country in the world.

The people should get together and demand that the government change many of its policies towards the rich, and super rich.

If this doesn’t happen then other progressive steps should be taken.

The Death Penalty

The Death Penalty

I’m not sure as to which issue is more critical, as to which issue is more important, which issue should have a slightly higher priority. Here are some issues that might be the biggest issues facing humanity in this modern world.

War might be the biggest issue facing humanity

War, continuous armament of the world

Disease epidemics

Extreme Poverty, Inequality

Corruption,

Destruction of the environment

I’ve decided to focus on one issue, and I write about it here:

I must admit that on first thought, very first thought, I found it hard not to put a person to death, that I knew “beyond a reasonable doubt” committed heinous crimes against other people. Maybe that emotion and thought are conditioned for me because I live in this country. But after thinking about it for just a moment, I realize that the death penalty is wrong, and should be abolished.

The death penalty is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. It violates the right to life. It is irrevocable and can be inflicted on the innocent. It has never been shown to deter crime more effectively than other punishments. - (Amnesty International). http://web.amnesty.org/pages/deathpenalty-index-eng

I’ve observed this in social sciences that something to be true has to have observed bombers behind it. Not everything can have these numbers, but many things can. It is shocking that there are 106 death sentences and 60 executions in the United States in the year 2005, when the death penalty was never proven to deter crime more than other methods (Amnesty International). That is the bottom line then, does it deter crime, and it doesn’t.

Now further steps need to be taken, what is to be done with the most horrific of criminals? A serial killer or a terrorist responsible for a bombing which killed 60 people at a temple. Well is it possible to release such people back into society, so they can live on their own? I don’t know, the answer to this question, but it seems like they can’t be. One option would be too force them to work in confinement, all the time treating them humanely. Of course throughout, reasonably, we teach and change the individual for the better and see what happens.

Important Parts of the Super Initiative

Important Parts of the Super Initiative


We would form a group, or improve on existing ones, that would try to invoke the greatest participation by other people as possible. One of the main goals, would be to invoke the greatest impact on our politicians to change the way our big businesses exist, and to change the way the very rich live in this country. The goal is to get all middle and lower class citizens of the globe to participate to improve the economic inequality of our globe.

On a different smaller community level, I would get the message out by posting messages on likely websites, newspapers, magazines, TV ads, signs on buses, walls, and huge billoboards. I would also get the message out with the help of other existing similar organizations and local government.

The people around the world would be the natural support system, and the formal support systems would be US and the systems and organizations that WE interact with that would be occupied all day on the issue. Some would be NGO, non-profit, type groups. Some would be non-profit because, in a way, that is the point.

Change will be on many levels. One will include social support networks of family and friends. “The only thing that poor people have is each other”; we are going to improve on this truth, and we are going to change it by significantly changing the face of poverty. Now, the poor are going to have everyone.

Monday, April 24, 2006

PDA

Source of Crisis/The Rich get Richer the Poor get Poorer


Economic Setup, of the Globe

Source: Stems from our economic setup, big buisness owns the globe. The very largly unrestrained captialism in our country and around the world. Globalization seems to brinning a lot of horrible greed and inequlity to every single place possible. A huge reason why the Pandemic in Africa is so signinficant is because drug companies like Pfizer want to meke huge profits with the cost of human lives.


In the US, most progressives start to see the differences between internationalism and economic globalization.
David Korten


“Power and legitimacy of the institutions of the global economy rest on the foundation of a falsified culture” there’s “Hope in both the growing citizen resistance and the evidence of an awakening of cultural consciousness that is preparing the way for deep transformational change.” http://www.davidkorten.org/books.htm

Course of Action: A solution would be to put more restraints on captialsm, by government. This would make government more powerful and companies less, but the majority of people control the government, right? People could exert some manner of control over corporations, we would still make them competetive in the global market, but without the horoundous profits no matter what the cost.

Government Corruption

Source: Congressman and senators get millions of campaign money, in return for contracts. War’s are started just so that the rich get richer, this not only makes the poor poorer, it kills them. So, in reality, the richest of the country are killing the poorest, becasuse of their greed. The profiteers are the oil and weapons corporations, and the greed of the our goverment itself.

Course of Action: The course is to push our Congressman and Senetors for as much non-corruption legislation as possible.

A government, for protecting business only, is but a carcass, and soon falls by its own corruption and decay.”

Amos Bronson Alcott

Greed

It is a lie that people will start their lives at the bottom of the economy and end up at the very top. Getting to that place is by inheritanc only. There is a culture of greed out there. The very rich come from a culture in which as much money is aquired through any means possible, and then it’s not talked about, its just. It is taboo to talk about the subject of money.


“HBO: Do you think money is America's biggest taboo topic,?” Johnson: “I really think it is. Especially for people who are rich, I think money is certainly the number one taboo topic. More inappropriate than anything else.”

Somehow the ultra rich should be spoken to, got trough to. Maybe there should be campaings to try and communicate diffrnet attitudes, and behaviours towards rich people.

Friday, March 17, 2006

How Far?

How Far?

That’s what I’m going to do in my life, I’m going to find the most critical issue (and I’m going to thoroughly research this, and then I’m going to ask myself how much am I willing to commit myself towards changing this issue, all the w’s and the h, what am I willing to do.

The issues kinna secluded in my head now are, poverty, the media, the horror of war, horrible diseases, politcs, journalism.
That is bad, that is so wide, it's not good. Wider isn't neccessairly better.

It’s the question what do you most want to do with your life, and how far are you willing to go. It is true, most people think about what car their going to buy then what their going to be for the rest of their lives.

From Muhammad Yunus, Banker to the poor, to Is there any hope for humanity?

From

The Muhammad Yunus articles.

Banker to the Poor,

To,

Is there any hope for humanity?

Man's nature is not essentially evil. Brute nature has been know to yield to the influence of love. You must never despair of human nature.
Mohandas Gandhi

Muhammad Yunus, seems like a great person.

Although all people are great, it’s just that the greatness of most people doesn’t get much attention unless something that gets attention is done, like what M. Yunus. did.

Here’s the idea:

To lend money to the poorest, to receive a return, to profit, and to continue lending money to the poor.

It’s a great idea.

He deals with my topic, the topic I am most interested in. I believe that this is the most pressing issue on the planet, along with starvation, slavery, and disease.

“You cannot distinguish the person alive from the person dead because they look exactly the same”

“Dying of hunger is absolutely merciless”

I really like his approach, it reminds me of Buddhism, and the Dalai Lama.

“What good were all my complex theories when people were dying of starvation on the sidewalks and porches across from my lecture hall?,

That people need to be careful that all they do is talk.

Makes me want to be a banker for good, go straight to being some business/accounting major, so then I can be of a lot greater impact than if I go the psych route.

This is fascinating

That unlike normal banks with the Greenman,

“The less you have, the higher priority you become and if you have nothing you get the highest priority”

“Money that went to the family through the women brought much more benefit to the family than money going to the family through men”

“We will give priority to women”

Poverty, “It does not belong in a civilized human society”

“I believe that they will probably be angry at us their [our children’s] ancestors”

“I hope that our generation will be the last generation to see wide-spread poverty on this planet”

This would be the generation before mine

Unfortunately, I get the feeling that the goal of 100,000 million families reached, preferably through woman, wasn’t attained. I really should see the progress that is being made with micro credit, the situation now. That would be very helpful, and enlarge my knowledge of this (multiplication wise), not exponentially but the other one.

Yunus said that “ All we can say with a fair amount of certainty is that the speed of change will become faster and faster – it is very unlikely to slow down”

After some thought, what he says, rings true to me. M. Yunus says that and he wonders if that change will take “us closer or further towards desired social and economic conditions”

If I had to pick one, on a community psych final, if there was one, I would have pick that life will get worse. Of course, I could pick the opposite, knowingly full well that I’m wrong, but “I’m going to pick it, anyway”, but that’s just foolish, and really won’t help.

M. Yunus says that the first step is deciding where we want to be in the 2050,

I also believe that sometimes it’s good just to go in a general direction, and be content knowing that your going the right direction, b/c the more detailed destination might not be there. Also, the life is in the journey not the destination truth.

I agree on the topic of charity, charity is good, but it can also be bad in that in so many cases. “Charity only perpetuates the problem by taking away initiative from the poor.”

I imagine ¾ the people in this country don’t give to any charities. M. Yunus said that giving to charity appeases our consciences. It definitely does to a lot of people, but I would argue, that to at least half, it doesn’t but they give because its what they know what to do, and they are so wrapped up in their daily lives that, that just works out.

People always do what they are concerned with. People take care of what they are concerned with. Most Americans that can do anything about poverty, meaning who aren’t poor themselves, don’t bother with poverty, or other humanitarian issues, because they are too wrapped up in their own lives. American culture doesn’t value humanitarian interests, here and across the globe very much.


“Even today we don’t pay serious attention to the issue of poverty because the powerful remain relatevily untouched by it” M. Yunus

Rich people don’t talk about money because in a big way its taboo for them too.

This has been passed on from generation to generation. Kids are encouraged not to talk about money.

Very rich people don’t have to find work, instead they have to find something to do with their time. They then must find hobbies, or jobs that don’t have to be real jobs, just stuff to do on a daily bases.

Wealthy and powerful people are so much farther away from poverty than the middle class, and the middle class is far away from poverty itself.

The middle class sometimes has contact with the realities of poverty, and therefore they are aware of poverty so much more, than the upper class.

Much of the middle class has to severely struggle with daily life, and they see the whole time what it would be to be poor, they have the fear of being poor in front of them.

Rich and powerful people are above all this and they don’t even notice the amazing misery that exists.

“In a greed-based economy, obviously, changes will be greed driven. These changes may not always be socially desirable. Socially desired changes may not be attractive from the greed perspective” That is very sad to me. The world is run by G8, and all they do there is think and implement ways to be as successful as possible in being greedy, in taking the money from the poor and giving it to the rich.

That is horrible though, we live in a greed-based economy. And therefore in a greed based world. Our democratic capitalism is not about competition, but about the elimination competition.

I have always noticed this, from very early on in my life, the connection between the acquisition of money, and life. I saw this connection more so than other kids. We had tough times; and this taught me about money.

It is so clear, it can’t be more black and white, and that the vast majority of the companies in the US are so greed based it seems their evil. It seems that half of them actually are, evil. The other half is just existing in the world, responding to other markets, other companies.

But the bottom line is that

I’m not sure of the exact number but a CEO, earns more than 300 times that a entry level employee does. If that’s not greed I don’t know what is.

There is the argument that well, they earned it. No, they haven’t. The wealth is and will be passed on forever. And, when referring to the people that start the company, to the one in a 10,000 that starts a very successful company, there isn’t anything that they could have done to deserve this inequality.

They outsource everything, they downsize, they merge, they take over.

Newspapers aren’t liberal enough.

It seems that

In life, people think that governments and politics are more powerful than the economies, but that is not true, the economies have the upper hand.

The terms democracy, socialism and communism all refer to types of economies and not types of governments, like the vast majority of the public thinks.


Makes you wonder, if humanity

Since history, has humanity progressed morally, intellectually, concisely?

Because of science classes, physics classes, and attention to the current times, the only progress I’m sure of is the progress of technology.

Has it only grown in size, gotten older, accumulated more history, and has stayed pretty much the same intellectually, morally, and concisely?

Is there Political, Social, Economic, and Political and Global progress?

The earth is closer and smaller now than it has ever been.

All the history lessons I’ve had, US, World, the political classes I’ve had, the social classes, I seem to get the idea that the world is moving forward, but painfully, painfully slowly. It seems that people are treating each other slightly better in modern times, but that humanitarian treatment is the least priority and the very slowest for anything. It is a different world now, and hopefully things are like this because although we are smarter, the challenges presented are tougher

But, or

How can we say there is any progress, how can we say that people are treating each other more humanely when one looks at what’s going on, in the world now?

That doesn’t make sense,

the challenges throughout history were always about equal. And if we are better overall, then should there be less bloodshed, foolishness, greed, barbarism, backwardness, and ignorance.

But in the end does it matter? If our world is doomed, then we should still try to save it, if its not, then we should still try to save it.

If it is doomed, then the way to act is the same exact way to act as if it wasn’t. No, it doesn’t matter if the world is doomed or not. We should be smart and very eager for making this world better for everyone. By being compassionate and human toward every human being we meet.

It seems that many fundamentalists, extremists, terrorists, criminals, thief’s, the ignorant, all are like little children, the weak, the lazy, the stubborn, the closed minded, a

They are children, even though they are adults, they often behave more immaturely than children. They share some of the characteristics of children, but not all.

You don’t treat these people completely like children.

If this explanation doesn’t completely make sense, now it doesn’t completely click for me either.

But

Absolutely sure, is that these weak people, should be treated like people, like you and me.

They should be treated with the same strong compassion everyone else is treated. Their human beings, with all the same reflexes, emotions, feelings, needs. It should be always remembered and lived that what binds us is so much, and that we instead focus on what separates us too much, when what separates us can be so little.

There will be people that don’t share this view at all, and rather think that there is nothing in common. This does nothing negative towards the person that knows that is the biggest lie. Instead, it will be a lot easier handling that person, interacting with him, because, everyone recognizes compassion and respect. If that person is not to be approached, then you will know that’s how things are sometimes.

Whoever isn’t a fundamentalist,

The Muslim extremists and fundamentalist.

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

first response to Attila's blog

Hello Attila,

I don’t think the similarities in the economic group point towards poverty being completely solvable.
If anything, they say that the situation can be improved, with no specific extent.

Also,

The Existential approach described really bugs me. What’s more real than people dying of hunger, starving to death? Really. The definition of existentialism is that a person lives live for himself, and should know that his actions have consequences and that responsibility should be taken. Agreeing that something happened because of me.
An existential approach see the obvious, that poverty, and extreme poverty exist. Existentialism is not moral; but the above things are true.

Response to Attila

Response to Attila

Thanks for that great long response

Honestly, it shows effort, and thoughtfulness

That’s what I meant, existentialism is amoral.

The whole existentialism debate seems way too unnecessarily complicated for me.

For me personally. I don’t have too much experience with existentialism, mainly Crime and Punishment and a paper that came as a result.

I think what’s important is trying to solve the most, most, crucial problem, perceived in the best way, with the best possible answer.

Best,

Response to Samantha Kunze,

Response to Samantha Kunze,
Hey Samantha thanks for posting,

In response to your post:

You said that there’s plenty of media representation out there on it.
In my opinion either there isn’t enough, or it isn’t good enough because this dire, dire, problem exists to such a crippling extent in this world.

I think that desensitization ,( took me a while to spell this word) when see homeless on the screens, has very, very, little to do with the problem. But the way Politics and big media, and big companies, describe the poor is a big problem.

People generally agree that poverty is the lack of basic necessities. Most agree it is a problem in America and focus on that issue and not the global inequity. It is generally seen as a large problem.

In response to your problem definitions:

The government and the rich are intertwined, interwoven, much of the time they are same thing. So, both would be to blame, more than responsible, to blame.

I think that personal attributes of course have to do with poverty, but their far from being the main cause. Especially when a global perspective is taken. Millions and millions of people are starving because their lazy, have character flaws, or unstable?

All the Best

Personal Account (posted , somewhere else first)

Hey group, Jacob told us to find examples of zooming in, of personal experiences, of first hand accounts. He told us to find these also on the internet right?

Hello Ariann,

Thanks a lot for the initiative of contacting us.

R u in Community Psych?

What do you think would be the most significant, important, thing you could tell us about your experience in Guatemala?

Do you have any ideas about best solutions?

R there any things you would like to share?

Thanks a lot.

I'll give a bit from me too:

Me and my mom were on welfare at one point.

That was a long time ago.

I know, very well, how heroic my Mother is everyday.

Currently, all she does is drive her taxi cab, all day, at least 14 hrs a day, every other day. In the days not driving, she rests, is now working on her associates, and takes care of errands. We live in a small, one bedroom apartment in Chicago. Wait, I live here in Chambana, and go home between school. The main reason I’m in the National Guard is b/c I wanted the school benefits.

If u guys have any questions or anything, U know where to find me.

Monday, February 13, 2006

Hello Attila,

I don’t think the similarities in the economic group point towards poverty being completely solvable.
If anything, they say that the situation can be improved, with no specific extent.

Also,

The Existential approach described really bugs me. What’s more real than people dying of hunger, starving to death? Really. The definition of existentialism is that a person lives live for himself, and should know that his actions have consequences and that responsibility should be taken. Agreeing that something happened because of me.
An existential approach see the obvious, that poverty, and extreme poverty exist. Existentialism is not moral; but the above things are true.

1st Comment on other's Blog

Hello Kim,

This is nothing in response to what you wrote, their' experts, just maybe the catogorization:

I would categorize add/adhd problem defintions as: due to:


genetic,

physiological that's non genetic

sociolization of behaviour

I've given this some thought,

to me this is a lot more clearer than internal and external,

the word pairs are important or else it becomes confusing again

I heard, from somewhere, not offical at all, that its the way children are thought to behave that makes them have difficulty focusing attention.

They learn most when their in the company of other kids their own age, and boys especially in play never pay attention too anything for too long, its cool to be all over the place.

just something to think about.

It seemed to make sense to me.

I sometimes seem to see stuff like this among conversation's of adults, our age, here on campus, they move on from topic to topic, so superfically, so fast it seems very annoying,

but that just may be nothing.

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

Testing Hypothesis

My problem definition analysis: Various Ways of Approaching Poverty

(half of my time on this was spent trying to figure out what to do)

1

People realize that poverty is a problem, but they just ignore it. Their just not the activist type. There is lack of action on their part. They might recognize it as the worst problem, but they still don’t care. Almost everyone is aware that poverty exists, and much of it exists here at home, its just that many don’t feel the ambition, drive, and virtue, to do something about it. Many people would do something about poverty, its just that they themselves are poor.

There is this culture amongst the extremely rich, of keeping money to themselves, of keeping money in the family. Of not talking about it, because that makes it bad class. This also helps perpetuate poverty, and the extreme inequality in this and other countries. It’s necessary to press on to rich people, their extra responsibilities since their rich.

Jamie Johnson is the director of the HBO documentary Born Rich, here’s a separate
interview

“HBO: Do you think money is America's biggest taboo topic?
JAMIE JOHNSON: I really think it is. Especially for people who are rich, I think money is certainly the number one taboo topic. More inappropriate than anything else.”

HBO: What would you like people to take away from Born Rich?

JAMIE JOHNSON: It's just something most people don't get to see otherwise, and it kind of opens up a taboo subject. It just scratches the surface of talking about wealth and the subject of money in our culture. And I think that that's interesting. It's something that people don't really deal with in a realistic way.

HBO:
Do you have plans for more movies?
JAMIE JOHNSON: I really want to make more documentaries. I love documentary filmmaking. And I want to continue on with it as a career. I am really interested in these subjects of socioeconomic inequality and social class, and things like that. I think in the next few weeks as this one comes out and people start to respond to it, I'll figure out what the next move is”

http://www.hbo.com/docs/programs/born_rich/interview.html

A big cause of poverty is the lack of proper media presentation.

“I feel most global issues are misrepresented in the mainstream for various reasons. Some issues may not be receiving enough—or any—mainstream media attention and therefore there is a lack of enough open and public debate, while other concerns seem to be getting a biased attention only“

http://www.globalissues.org/about/

A big cause of poverty is lack of education.

“Rising school fees, the costs of school uniforms and textbooks, and widespread cultural biases against educating girls all contribute to these unacceptable statistics. According to UNICEF, one out of every six children born to women without an education dies before the age of five. That rate is reduced by half if a woman receives primary school education. Each additional year of education for girls beyond grade three results in up to a 20 percent increase in wages, 10 percent fewer childhood deaths and up to a 10 percent reduction in birth rates/”

http://www.results.org/website/article.asp?id=370

2 “My Working Hypothesis of Meaningful Differences in Problem Definition”:

It is a major problem. Poverty should be among the top priorities of state and national governments. Poverty exists everywhere, in every State in the US, and in every country in the world. Stems from the economic setup, wherever that may be.

It should be brought to the spotlight, of national media attention, and not hidden by the media

Opposing Viewpoint

“According to official statistics, the distribution of income has become increasingly unequal during the past two decades. A common reaction in the popular press, in political debate, and in academic discussions is to regard the increase in inequality as a problem that demands new redistributive policies. I disagree. I believe that inequality as such is not a problem and that it would be wrong to design policies to reduce it. What policy should address is not inequality but poverty.”

http://www.nber.org/feldstein/pi99.html

Modal Ideas for Approaching Poverty.

Modal Ideas for Approaching Poverty.

  1. It is a major problem
  2. Poverty should be among the top priorities of state and national governments.
  3. Poverty exists everyhwere, in every State in the US, and in every country in the world.
  4. Stems from the economic setup, wherever that may be.
  5. People should be educated about the seriousness of this extremely widespread inequality.

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

My Original Proposals

Starvation

This is very important. I was always interested in even more serious starvation in third world countries, all over the world. Africa for example. I can start learning about such extreme problems here at home, but I would like to get some basic knowledge of what’s going on there. Of course, the problems existence perpetuates the problems. People that are weak and dying, have a hard time helping themselves. There’s lack of information about agriculture, basic engineering. Lack of food underlies the extreme problem, bad weather like dry spells. The greed of the world.


Lack of Access to Basic Needs

These needs would include housing, clothes, food, medical. The number of human beings that are homeless and die in the freezing alleys at night in the US is staggering. The amount of homelessness. In the world, in third world countries, such as Taiwan is also an outcry. I would like to learn about the steps that are being taken, being planned in dealing with these problems. Then I would like to learn about proposed solutions. There is vary significant lack of basic needs in Chicago. I live in Chicago, and see this often enough.



The Media News Portrayal of What’s
Important

This seems like an important issue for me. The major news outlets, much of the time report news that’s not very important. Major sources like CNN, NBC news, ABC news, not to mention FOX, don’t report the overwhelming violations against the people of this country done by companies and the government. Much of the time the companies and government work against the people. The news doesn’t report any of these apparent violations, unless it’s absolutely forced to. They certainly don’t look for them, don’t (gasp) investigate them. Their paid not too. The news literally reports on Cats getting stuck in trees, and celebrity gossip. They ignore, consciously look past, anything that goes against the policy sent from the government, like activism, and contrary opinions.